Construction is underway for two important AState projects.
Looking at Other School Finances
A number of institutions operate their athletic fund raising as an arm of the university foundation. This makes comparisons difficult because athletic related income is not independently stated in the tax returns. Some of these schools will include a line item indicating foundation funds spent on athletics. It is reasonable to assume the amount paid for athletic purposes tracks fairly closely to the amount raised for athletic purposes but there is no assurance that any of it was generated by athletics or that athletics did not generate more.
Other schools do not note athletic expenditures within the foundation report and are not filing a return for a booster club either. That leaves the list of Sun Belt schools and recently departed Sun Belt schools a bit bare.
You just can’t easily do an apples to apples comparison in this area. While I don’t know their current practice, UALR used to include a booster club donation in every ticket sale, the money still spends but it is (or maybe now was) an unknowing contribution. There are other revenue sources such as soft drink pouring rights and the royalties for the sale of licensed merchandise that are treated differently at different institutions.
In the following list any school noted with an * does not separately report athletic income and the figure is reported expenditure by the foundation.
Appalachian State* $3,642,207
Georgia Southern $5,670,457 (see note)
New Mexico State $1,497,368
South Alabama $765,505
Western Kentucky $2,447,061
I’m a bit unsure how to interpret the Georgia Southern numbers. They reported having spent less than half of their revenue (AState and the other schools reporting booster clubs independently tend to spend 80% to 90% of revenue). Georgia Southern also indicates they are carrying debt of more than $24 million and report less than $1 million spent on support of Georgia Southern Athletics. My best stab at a guess is they were stock-piling cash for a capital campaign ahead of the FBS move. I think the revenue reported being so high is either related to a campaign or some revenue source that is more typically assigned to general athletic revenue, depending on the higher ed finance laws and regulations in Georgia there may be reasons to choose to do this that may not make sense in other states.
AStateNation.com Recommended Stories
Rivalry Week on Scout
Build yourself a sky-high left-over turkey sandwich, cover it in a creamy sauce of hate, and get ready to scream!Read More
Scout College Football Top 30- Week Thirteen
The top 30 teams in college football after Week Thirteen...Read More
Outdoorsman's Gift Guide: Christmas 2014
Finding just the right present for that special someone can be a challenge, so we’ve compiled a wide variety of hunting, fishing and outdoor gifts that you—or Santa—can deliver this Christmas.Read More
Week 13: Player Downgrades
Every week, Fantasy Football Expert Rusty Reeves predicts a heaping handful of players who will decline in the coming weeks. They should be downgraded at least one tier. Chicago Bears QB Jay Cutler …Read More
The First Thanksgiving: 10 Myths and Facts
The story of the first Thanksgiving is filled with folklore and legend. But what’s the real story? Here are 10 commonly believed myths about the First Thanksgiving debunked.Read More